Y is for Yerkes-Dodson Law

Since its inception in 1908, numerous studies have verified the Yerkes-Dodson Law with many variables. It provides a neurobiological explanation for amnesia. So, what is the Yerkes-Dodson Law?

What does it take to get you to do something? Motivation? Interest? These are forms of arousal. Robert Mearns Yerkes (1876–1956) and John Dillingham Dodson (1879–1955) discovered there is an empirical relationship between arousal and performance.

Original Yerkes-Dodson Model

Yerkes & Dodson

Robert Yerkes and John Dodson studied rats. The goal was to teach the rats to run through a maze. Dead ends included an electric shock. The results of the study showed if the shock was too low, the rats did not learn as quickly. On the other hand, if the shock was too high, they would forget safe zones they had already learned or retreat and refuse to run the maze at all.

Image compliments of Amazon ~ click to access

Their article in the 1908 Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology was called Relation of Strength of Stimulus to Rapidity of Habit-Formation¹. Although the article did not state the law specifically, the curve represents arousal and not stress.

The single line represents easy tasks. Simple tasks do not have much room for error, and high arousal does not diminish performance of them.

Manhattan 11SEP01

Flashbulb memories are those created during highly emotional or high stress situations. For example, one remembers where one was and what one was doing at the time of assassinations, deaths and tragedies.

Fear conditioning is when we predict adverse results, events and consequences. One needs only to put one’s hand in the fire once to know not to repeat it.

The curve represents more complex situations. When arousal increases beyond a certain level, elements of the task are overlooked or solutions are less well-thought-out with less than desirable long term effects.

Yonderly

Not devoting the appropriate amount of attention.

When arousal (interest and attention) are low, we are less likely to pay attention to details. Driving is a good example. When we are listening to the radio or talking on our cell phones, we are less likely to notice things like slight differences in engine performance, which can lead to expensive repairs or crashes.

We get comfortable doing tasks and do not devote the appropriate attention to them because they do not arouse us.

Yes!

When tasks have an appropriate level of arousal, we perform better. With a combination of factors, we are better focused. If the task is new, interesting and/or slightly unpredictable, we devote the appropriate amount of attention to produce the best results.

This is the optimum level of arousal.

Yaw

Just pick something, even if it is wrong.

We run between ideas without dedicating adequate contemplation when we are over-aroused. We ignore basic details we would have noticed if we were not over-aroused. Typical examples of high-arousal conditions are exhaustion, previous failure and lack of concentration (distraction).

High arousal decreases the quality of performance.

Ten paces, turn and fire.

Yagers at Ten Paces

After nearly fifty years of being largely ignored, studies on the Yerkes-Dodson Law took it in a new direction. Bones of contention surfaced in the 1950s.

Arousal ≠ Stress

Yerkes and Dodson both studied the YDL independently after 1908, coming to conclusions which supported the law in practical settings. Both agreed arousal and stress were different things. Where arousal was supported by motivation, interest, curiosity, emotion and satisfaction, stress was created when the actual arousal level did not match the preferred level.²

Studies in the fifties used more stressors than motivators and all ended with only the curvilinear result. While it proved increased stress produced poorer performance, it was a misquote of the Yerkes-Dodson Law.

Task Difficulty

How difficult a task is bears on the arousal and stress rates. Fifties’ studies did not include simple tasks and did not produce the linear results Yerkes and Dodson got. The most accepted studies were those of Donald Hebb, who studied primates.

Original Yerkes-Dodson Law graph referencing task difficulty

Based on the difficulty he encountered teaching the primates (mostly chimpanzees) anything, he disregarded the Yerkes-Dodson linear result and made the curve the only result from the study. Hebb’s curve is still featured prominently, most times to the exclusion of the Yerkes-Dodson graphs, in psychology textbooks as the Yerkes-Dodson Law.

If Hebb’s theory is to be believed, flashbulb memories cannot exist. The highly emotional state required for flashbulb memories would disintegrate the neural pathways which produce memories.

PTSD

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder is the penultimate example of the Yerkes-Dodson Law. The high-stress associated with the precipitating event produces long-lasting emotional response and memories. This belies the simple curve as being the only solution to the arousal-performance correlation.

You

One of the largest variables is the personal level of arousal-tolerance a person brings to the experiment. Some people thrive under higher stress levels and through distraction. Others simply cannot compensate for outside influences or emotionally-charged situations.

Yet

Robert Yerkes

The Yerkes-Dodson Law is one of the most quoted in all of neuroscience and behavioral science, yet it is probably the least read. Only when the law was nearing its 100th anniversary have researchers begun to delve into the complexities of the Yerkes-Dodson Law with reference to job performance.

Hanoch and Vitouch argued the accepted and over-simplified version of the YDL needs to be reestablished using new research presented between 1977 and 2007.  The argument is “what Yerkes and Dodson had in mind was more sophistication than what their U-entranced successors made of it … later generations let the law collapse into one single curve with its idealized and highly abstract, quasiunidimensional axes”.³

Yarn

While it is easier to just accept the oversimplified version of the YDL in terms of coping with work and familial situations, there is much to discover in the ways the body responds to hormones and emotions in terms of memory and critical thinking (problem-solving) with the expanded, original version of the Yerkes-Dodson Law.



YERKES, R.M. & DODSON, J.D. (1908).  The Relation of Strength of Stimulus to Rapidity of Habit-Formation. Journal of Comparative and Neurological Psychology. Volume 18. pp.459-482

STOKES, Alan. & KITE, Kirsten. (1994). Flight Stress: Stress, Fatigue, and Performance in Aviation. U.K: Ashgate. pp. 31-45

HANOCH Y, VITOUCH O. (2004) When less is more: information, emotional arousal and the ecological reframing of the Yerkes-Dodson law. Theory & Psychology. 14(4): pp. 427–452.

~~~~~~~~~~

Do you have any flashbulb memories? How does your arousal rate change your performance? Have you seen the Yerkes-Dodson Law in practice where you work? 

If you tweet or +1 this post, please use the hashtag #AtoZChallenge!

© Red Dwyer 2012
Re-Blogging of this or any other post on The M3 Blog 
is expressly forbidden. 
Copyright and Privacy Policy available
in The Office. 
Leave a comment

25 Comments

  1. When I have too much chocolate, I can get a little fuzzy.
    Binky recently posted..Genealogy and The Study of GeniesMy Profile

    Reply
  2. As always Red you bring a new dimension to our thinking about ourselves and our patterns. I had heard of the later study but not the first, at least not in the detail you have provided.

    Your example is fabulous, brings to bear real life.
    valentinelogar recently posted..Sunshine DaysMy Profile

    Reply
    • Red

       /  April 30, 2012

      This is one of those…we all know it works, but glad there was someone to do the research so we have proof it works…Just wish all business models were required to learn it in advance of job placement. Makes you scratch your head about whether the Soviets may have had something scientific behind their job placement testing. Makes you think…

      Reply
      • Just one more thing on my list of WTF, why do we always dismiss things that make sense?
        valentinelogar recently posted..I Am What I AmMy Profile

        Reply
        • Red

           /  April 30, 2012

          I think this is one which could take a whirl around the propaganda blender. It is neither far-fetched nor ludicrous, yet easily ignored. Remember, for the first 50 years, no one (in this country) could find a use for this. I see more uses for it in today’s world than I did then.

          Reply
  3. What an excellent educational piece you have here. Most all of this I did not even know about. It really give me the opportunity to look closer look into my own patterns.
    Have a most wonderful day, Red!
    Hugs, xx
    Deb recently posted..R is for RedMy Profile

    Reply
    • Red

       /  April 30, 2012

      This is probably as far out on the technical end as I will get. Once I finish this challenge, we may go back and look at how this affects the way we work, which is the best execution of this law. It helps us understand where to draw boundaries to keep from driving ourselves bats getting our work done. Hope you are having beautiful weather. Still a bit cloudy and rainy here 🙁
      {HUGZ}

      Reply
  4. Having to do the math behind all those graphs would have been a bit too high voltage for my liking, I think.
    🙂
    spilledinkguy recently posted..Pepper in Black Semi-GlossMy Profile

    Reply
    • Red

       /  April 30, 2012

      LOL! No ECT for you. And I happen to know you can count. I have seen some of the tiling you have done!

      Reply
  5. I heard of a way to get the Yerkes & Dodson
    Law repealed…but I forget.

    Reply
  6. Y IS FOR YIKES YOU ARE ONE BRIGHT LADY !!!!!
    YOWZERS I AM LIKING IT IN HERE …….

    AND YES ………
    GRATEFUL TO HAVE CONNECTED XO
    YOU YOU YOU
    HAVE SO MUCH TO TEACH ALL OF US XOXO
    Cat Forsley recently posted..“Perspective ..” She Said by Cat Forsley ©My Profile

    Reply
    • Red

       /  April 30, 2012

      LOL! This is play time for me. You came in on one of the most technical ones I have put on here. Hopefully, you will scroll around and find some others you like! Don’t forget to leave a link to your blog in the Green Room.

      Reply
  7. I AM BEDAZZLED …….
    !!!!!!
    I JUST WROTE DEB – WOW …….
    WHOM IS THIS LADY !!!!! AMAZING ……
    A WHOLE CONVERSATION WITH YOU UNDER MY ART STUFF –
    YOU ARE A POWERHOUSE OF AMAZING LOVE ENERGY ….
    YOU GOTTA KNOW THAT XO
    C
    Cat Forsley recently posted..“Perspective ..” She Said by Cat Forsley ©My Profile

    Reply
    • Red

       /  April 30, 2012

      Doll, you will come to realize I am the official “Call it like I see it” woman in the bunch. I view creativity everywhere it is shared and acknowledge talent in everyone. It is just as easy to be uplifting and positive as it is to be negative and destructive. {HUGZ} Red. xxx

      Reply
  8. BUT THE CHALLENGE IS …..
    IN MY EYES TO RISE RISE RISE TO THE OCCASION – OF SPREADING LOVE AND COMPASSION –
    THAT’S WHAT I AM ALL ABOUT …..
    THE NEGATIVE IS ALWAYS THERE – BUT AGAIN WITH PERSPECTIVE – AND I GOTTA KEEP MY EYES ON IT ALL THE TIME – OR ELSE I SHIFT INTO UNHAPPY CAT ……

    TO SPREAD LOVE COMPASSION AND JOY IS MY MEANING OF LIFE XOXOXOXOXOXOOXOXOXOXOOXOXO
    C
    Cat Forsley recently posted..“Perspective ..” She Said by Cat Forsley ©My Profile

    Reply
  9. I hope those Rats had some nice treats afterwards? 🙂 It’s nearly as bad as Zapping the Monster.. Poor Thing 🙁 lol Kidding 🙂

    I really like this one and have actually heard of this topic before, though I certainly enjoyed reading your take on everything and the way in which you have offered it is excellent 🙂

    Have a lovely Tuesday Red 🙂

    Androgoth XXx

    Reply
    • Red

       /  May 1, 2012

      LOL! I think the monster was glad for the jolt in the end! Figuratively, of course, not literally! Have a wondrous Tuesday, my dark friend!

      Reply
  10. Will there be a test on this. As I was reading my mouse shocked me a few times. I was goin’ to look around some more but I have a cravin’ for some cheese and crackers right now.
    Bo Lumpkin recently posted..Feelin’ FunnyMy Profile

    Reply
    • Red

       /  May 1, 2012

      We rarely test on laws. There is a voltometer in the closet. Perhaps you should check the mouse. Cheese and crackers are in the kitchen. Oh, and the bar is open. We operate on the theory it is 5 o’clock somewhere.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

CommentLuv badge

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.