The basis of identity is a definition. Identity is how we define ourselves by our beliefs and actions based on those beliefs. We draw boundaries we refuse to cross, effectively marking our territory. What happens when someone else makes those boundaries?
First
Someone had to lay boundaries for us when we were young. These were the people who raised us. The ‘rents were busy with their rules and religions to set goals and safe zones for us to have some semblance of a carefree childhood. Successful or not, they had our best interests at heart.
As we aged, we challenged those boundaries, broke some and replaced them with the boundaries which were appropriate for us. Occasionally, we set our boundaries inside those others had set for us. Many times we set them far beyond what others thought would be prudent for us.
Then
We learned. The School of Hard Knocks graduated us with the scar-laden diploma of learning some of the boundaries we laid really were not prudent. Whether emotional or physical, we found our pain thresholds: the upper limit of what we could withstand without exsanguinating.
Or so we thought.
Mate
When Mate entered the picture, we practiced the art of compromise, wittingly or unknowingly. Boundaries which did not exist based on our parental units or our own SHK discovery paths proliferated. We reined in some of our baser instincts; we accepted new responsibilities beyond our mere self-preservation; and we accepted the boundaries had changed.
Or did we?
Giving Up
How many people give up their own boundaries and accept Mate’s merely to keep the peace? How many trade their individuality to join the ranks of the attached? Who are willing to trade their souls to banish bachelorhood and spinsterhood?
All of Them
This sweeping generalization is true. In very few relationships does one partner, much less both Mates, maintain their individuality at its maximum with boundaries in tact. One immediate example is the self-governance of our time. There are two sides to the hourglass coin.
Heads
The splitting of duties in a relationship frees up time for both Mates. More hands lighten the load. Having a Mate to take some of the mundane tasks allows more time for other pursuits. Time you would have spent paying the bills is now open to pursue hobbies or continue to court Mate to sustain the relationship in much the tender state it began.
Time Mate would have spent doing yard work is now split between both to draw double duty for the relationship by sharing the time and the responsibility or is filled with education.
Both examples are healthy alternatives for the free time manufactured by the sharing of stressors and chores.
Tails
The alternative is the set of Mates where one maintains all of the responsibilities as though still single while having to care for Mate’s responsibilities in addition. This extreme adulteration of the give-and-take relationship has Giving Mate giving without the contribution of the other and/or Taking Mate creating addition drag by introducing new stressors:
- Unchecked financial irresponsibility
- Egocentric emotional responses to joint situations
- Failure to invest emotionally in the longevity of the relationship
Instead of both Mates giving and taking in some form of equity, they split give and take between each other.
Lose
No one wins the coin toss. Giving Mate loses identity to become the sole support for the relationship. The task of caring for all things financial, physical and emotional leaves no room for self-reflective and conscious-expanding pursuits.
Taking Mate may seem to be operating within completely self-determined boundaries. In fact, Taking Mate can only realize self-endeavors to the extent Giving Mate can afford the investment in them.
Choice
Both Mates have choices. They can choose together to create the boundaries which define the relationship and its reference to themselves. Individually, they can choose to engage the relationship or forego it in their individual pursuits. They can choose to be active participants in their own lives or not.
By choosing not, they are martyring their own identities for the trappings of a relationship, which in its state of ill health is poisonous to them.
Choose well.
To do otherwise is a recipe for depression, divorce and dysfunction which radiates to friends, children and family.
Do you and Mate choose together? Do you abide Mate’s choices as absolute? Do you define your own boundaries both with and without regard to Mate? How can knowing these choices in advance lead to healthier relationships and marriages?
Hashtags: #relationships #marriage #boundaries
Thank you for sharing The M3 Blog with these hashtags on your social media. If you do not know who The M3 Players are, check the playbill.
C. Brown
/ February 21, 2013I wish I had read this about 2 decades ago. 😉
Red
/ February 22, 2013I wish a lot of people had read this two decades ago 🙂 To be honest, I think you and your Mr. have a great relationship.
Binky
/ February 21, 2013I have a very good relationship with chocolate. I eat it, it makes me feel good.
Binky recently posted..English as a Second Language
Red
/ February 22, 2013There is no replacement for that kind of relationship.
lizziecracked
/ February 22, 2013This is why everyone should be issued a users manual.or at least the same one.
<3 Lizzie
lizziecracked recently posted..More Bang for the Buck – Valentine Mental Moment
Red
/ February 22, 2013I would love a user’s manual, but would settle for a pamphlet which had not been sent through Google Translate. <3
Bo Lumpkin
/ February 22, 2013One of the rules I have learned to live by is “It ain’t all about me.” I have worked in land surveying for years and the problem with boundaries is that they can’t overlap in land they way they do in personal relationships. Many of the problems in any kind of relationship comes from not respecting boundaries and trying to intrude into someone elses personal space.
Actually I know what I am saying even if it is as Clear as mud to everyone else. 🙂
Red
/ February 22, 2013Oh, I get it entirely. You give a great analogy for what I am saying. Personal space is very important.
Gail Thornton
/ February 22, 2013I am getting married for the second time. Recently I started a discussion with Mate which lead to our acceptance that we need more than a one bedroom apartment, which is all that has been available to us. We agree to wait two more years for two bedrooms because I have need for an office to write, and he has need for freedom to watch the telly, read, and listen to music during the day. I am at peace with it, whereas before I was climbing the wall with anxiety about how we were going to coexist.
Gail Thornton recently posted..FREE Cafe Comics – Bo Lumpkin
Red
/ February 23, 2013Very healthy planning and compromise. It shows you are entering into this with your eyes wide open as an individual and respecting his boundaries as well.
Valentine Logar
/ February 23, 2013Or you just pull hair by roots as you are dragged into the cave.
Where you start and where you end are not always the same. Redrawing the lines, not always simple or successful. Retreat? I don’t think it is always the best choice, even when it seems to be on the only one left.
This one needs to be put in a fold out at the door of the church, just before the wedding march is played.
Valentine Logar recently posted..March of Marriage
Red
/ February 23, 2013I know about the shift. I really wish it were handed out to everyone.
BuddhaKat
/ February 24, 2013I have identified within my self the leaning toward merging and melding with Mate, such that those boundaries of mine which are non-negotiable become questioned. It is a very tight rope we walk, at times, to maintain a healthy balance. I believe those that do are much the stronger for it!!
Very profound ponderings, Red!
🙂
BuddhaKat recently posted..Let’s Just Call It a Friday Fractal Feature…
Red
/ February 28, 2013I always advocate the smallest possible non-negotiable list, not because it opens the field, but because it opens the mind. xxx
gigoid, the dubious
/ February 22, 2017First, two things; I get it, completely, and can see the process you describe functioned in my own relationships with Mate(s)(one w/progeny included). Since I am now without an SO, (with more than a little degree of relief and appreciation, I must confess, at not having to compromise my own boundaries, wide as they are, with anyone but a feline familiar, who, honestly, provides more than enough of the necessary compromising). I suppose my boundaries, though I don’t insist on them being exclusive when in a relationship, are nonetheless difficult for others to deal with in that way…
That, I think, is due to the boundaries of which most are completely unaware of having, because they were embedded in their behavior since having them set for them by our human culture, and its more than confusing approach to our own nature…
That said, I think another element that needs voicing is that of honesty. I have found, in my own experience, if one partner isn’t honest, there is simply no compromise that will work to resolve any overlap, for the one who isn’t honest will alter their own according to their ego needs, without telling the other…or will refuse altogether, edging into being a Taker….
Finally, yes, knowing any of this prior to engaging in relations can only improve any relationship, as the Heads option maximizes the potential of the heterodyne factor of two, as being much, much more than one, when it comes to human beings… Tails, sadly, is what our culture teaches most of us to expect, and to perform…
xoxo
gigoid, the dubious recently posted..Oblique references to uncommon platitudes….
Red of M3
/ February 22, 2017The diamond which takes two to refine is being honest about the boundaries each “would” choose whilst forgetting the ones each has chosen. Only in the light of this dialogue can couples truly make choices which befit them individually and as a couple.
Yes, society was tails for a reason… ASS-in-ine.
xxx